
The Meaningfulness of Meaning: Living a Life Worthwhile
In this edition of Soul Notes, we explore the concept of meaning and what that constitutes in terms of a meaningful life. In this article, I’ll make references to one of Viktor Frankl’s books, originally entitled From Death Camp to Existentialism, now more commonly known by the title: Man’s Search for Meaning.
A doctor of psychiatry, Viktor Frankl (Frankl) is the founder of the psychotherapeutic school of thought he named logotherapy. In contrast to Sigmund Freud’s focus on human instincts and the human drive for pleasure, Frankl focused his work on man’s (humankind’s) quest for finding meaning in one’s life.
Part One of Man’s Search for Meaning documents Frankl’s personal experiences as an inmate in concentration camps during World War II. In Part Two of the book, he elaborates on logotherapy and how his experiences in the camps provided the backdrop for himself to become in effect his own best patient. Part Two includes examples of patients he treated beyond the camps along with scientific and statistical data to illustrate his points.
Prior to being captured, Frankl had already written the manuscript for his first book, The Doctor and the Soul. He had tucked the manuscript into his coat before being forced onto the train for Auschwitz. Once at the camp, he and all the other prisoners were stripped of their personal belongings. Accordingly, the manuscript he had hidden in his coat was quickly confiscated.
Adding then to the already deep poignancy of Frankl’s observations made during the Holocaust, is the fact that he by necessity documented them all from memory. He kept his mind sharp by reconstructing in his head the original manuscript of that first book that he would later rewrite and publish. The only physical remnants of the original manuscript that he had been able to reconstruct while in the camps were in the form of key words and phrases that he would surreptitiously scribble on tiny scraps of paper.
Beyond the physical: love, spirituality, and a life mission
Physically separated from his wife in the concentration camps, Frankl didn’t know if his wife was still alive. It was in his mind’s eye that he would hold onto an image of her. Just as through love he would cling to an image of his wife –- through a sense of commitment to his life’s work and overall life’s mission –- Frankl with devotion clung to the hope and intention of (re)writing his manuscript and publishing his psychological findings, all to the benefit of his profession and mental patients worldwide.
According to Frankl, love goes very far beyond the physical person of the beloved. Love finds its deepest meaning in one’s spiritual being, within the inner self. He also said that even during his time in captivity, glimpses of nature, music, and humor helped him and others to survive. They were grateful, he said, for the smallest of mercies.
Frankl further went on to contend that by devoting oneself to a cause to serve or another person to love, that the more human and actualized one becomes. In view of the possibility of finding meaning in suffering, he suggested then that life’s meaning even can be potentially unconditional.
If and when conditions get tough on the outside, spirituality can play an even more important role from the inside:
“In spite of all the enforced physical and mental primitiveness of the life in a concentration camp, it was possible for spiritual life to deepen. Sensitive people who were used to a rich intellectual life may have suffered much pain (they were often of a delicate constitution), but the damage to their inner selves was less. They were able to retreat from their terrible surroundings to a life of inner riches and spiritual freedom.” (Man’s Search for Meaning, page 36, emphasis added).
In other words, the type of person each prisoner would become resulted more from that person’s mental and spiritual state, than purely his physical state. Profoundly, Frankl maintained that one can decide to keep (and benefit from keeping) one’s human dignity, even in a concentration camp.
The meaning in suffering
Frankl was not suggesting that to have a meaningful life, one must suffer. He did profess, however, that if there is meaning in life at all, there must certainly be meaning in suffering. According to Frankl, those prisoners who discarded their inner morals, and who concluded that their lives were pointless, and thus “gave up” psychologically, were those who “forgot that often it is just such an exceptionally difficult external situation which gives man the opportunity to grow spiritually beyond himself.” (Man’s Search for Meaning, page 72).
The importance of having faith in the future and the power of personal choice
Frankl also understood the importance of having faith in the future. Without a belief in a better future, he said, a prisoner was subject to losing his spiritual hold, and thereby made himself more susceptible to mental and physical decay at a much more fervent pace.
So, what to do?
We may not be able to change every situation that we face in life. We can, however, change ourselves and our approach.
Through our attitudes, choices and decisions we make and the actions we take, we can rise to any challenge and accept the opportunity to infuse any situation with meaning, even the most difficult ones. Meaning is possible with or without (although perhaps most strikingly during times of) suffering.
Our lives are lived in moments. And every human being, as exemplified by Frankl, has the freedom to change themselves — and their experience of any situation in life — in an instant.
“[E]verything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms – to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.” (Man’s Search for Meaning, page 66).
Each of us gets to decide what our existence will be in any given moment, and what we will become in the next moment.
That is true freedom.
Freedom plus reasonableness
Freedom alone, however, is not enough. Frankl makes clear that freedom to choose must be combined with responsibleness. Otherwise, as a race, the human race, we are destined for destruction. Every person has both potentialities within us – to be either a swine or saint, he said. Which one is actualized, says Frankl, depends on the decisions we make, and not on the conditions we face.
So the beauty and the promise of Frankl’s work and legacy I would say is this:
Each of us has the challenge and the opportunity to bring with us the values of our past, make empowered choices and take responsible actions in the present, and thereby create futures of the highest value to humankind.
With that, we find meaning.
All is not lost.
Much is gained.
For your consideration:
What makes life meaningful? Can there be meaning in suffering? Is suffering required?
Okay, your turn:
What has helped you bring a sense of meaning into your life? Was suffering part of it?
I invite you to share your thoughts, feelings, and experiences by leaving a Reply in the Comments section, below. Soul-to-soul!

During this week of the new moon and the equinox, it’s a powerful time to feel into where you may be out of balance in your life, and to consider ways to bring yourself into a state of equilibrium.
It got me to contemplating about how much a strong core serves us overall in life as well. There will always be external, and sometimes internal, factors that threaten to throw us off balance. The stronger we develop and maintain our central strength, the greater the opportunity to live our lives from a place of equilibrium. It’s not passive. It’s active.
enerate our spiritually strong fire and heat – from a place of solidity, groundedness, centeredness – from a place of equilibrium! It’s stable, not wobbly. We each hold this potential within us. It’s simply up to each of us to take notice, take heed, and take action. It is what is especially needed now, during these turbulent times.
It’s a particularly energetically charged time in the United States, as evidenced by recent politically volatile and even at times highly venomous and violence-infused protests, and counterprotests, resulting in understandable public outcries and feelings of despair and disbelief.
What if duality were no longer how we positioned things? What if we were to approach these political divides from a place of universality, instead? As humans, after all: We share the same air, bleed the same blood, shed the same tears.
Varying to some degree only by age and gender, our human bodies are approximately 70 percent water. Water is the primary building block of human cells. And, water covers nearly 71 percent of the Earth’s surface. It’s vitally important to our existence, as individuals and as a species. And yet, or perhaps precisely because of its prevalence in our world, we tend to take it for granted. You’d think it would be difficult for us to ignore, but somehow we do?
In its natural form, water when frozen forms into hexagonal (six-sided) shaped ice crystals. The details within the outlying formation do vary (you may have heard the expression “no two snowflakes are exactly alike”) – but what remains constant in nature is the self-organizing pattern of six-sided frozen water crystals. There’s lots to explore with regard to sacred geometry (beyond the scope of this blog post), many aspects of which have been observed and studied over the past many centuries. It’s not merely a coincidence that many parts of nature, left to their own (divine?) devices, fall into recurring patterns. It’s the intervention of humankind that threatens to, and often does, however, disturb these naturally occurring patterns – as the Emoto experiments demonstrate.
Upon the return, I took my turn at the helm. Clearly, we knew our intention, and our destination – to get the boat and ourselves back to the mainland and the port from which we had originally departed. It was at that dock where we had left our cars, too – so we knew that’s where we needed to point the boat.

From idealist to lost in the practice of law
If you knew me back then, you would have called me an idealist. I was also, though, a pragmatist. I couldn’t end up helping anyone if I couldn’t afford to complete my law school education and pay off my law school debt. Accordingly, I found myself “chasing the almighty dollar.”
We represented large corporations, mostly with regard to breach of contract disputes. Why did I end up at a large firm, doing something pretty much polar opposite to what I really wanted to do? In a nutshell: Because it paid well.
What if, yes, what if I had the type of heart centered support from other women attorneys, mentors and role models available to me now, back then, so that: I didn’t feel so alone; didn’t feel so dismissed for my ‘feminine qualities’; I was valued for more than purely the number of hours I billed; and I was able to cultivate a culture that not only helped transform “big law” firm environments – but in doing so ultimately created more meaningful, heartfelt environments and results for litigants, too?
water and other natural elements. Along the way, they are also building up their strength. It takes power to sprout up through the soil. It also takes durability for a seed to break through its outer coating or “shell.” So, it’s in essence an active, deliberate process. Once that seedling’s toughness has been established, it’s ready to emerge from under the ground and out through the surface. From there, it is ready to grow into its fullest expression.
Allow me to clarify that this is not in any way intended to discredit the masculine. It’s merely an observation that the time has arrived where we’re seeing an uprising toward “tipping the scales” back a bit more toward symbiosis. The yin yang symbol itself, for example, represents this well, in my opinion. It’s a swirl of two mirror image shapes of the same size, embracing each other within the one circle. They complement rather than compete with one another. They hold each other in balance and securely in place.