Marching to the beat of a resurging drummer
This edition of Soul Notes is devoted to the seemingly ever-emerging resurrection of feminine leadership. By this, I mean not only the women (and men) who are stepping into leadership positions where they embody feminine principles (creation, co-creation, cooperation, and the like); by this I am also suggesting that each person has the opportunity to “lead with” and from a foundation of feminine principles in their own lives, in their families, and in their communities.
Allow me to clarify that this is not in any way intended to discredit the masculine. It’s merely an observation that the time has arrived where we’re seeing an uprising toward “tipping the scales” back a bit more toward symbiosis. The yin yang symbol itself, for example, represents this well, in my opinion. It’s a swirl of two mirror image shapes of the same size, embracing each other within the one circle. They complement rather than compete with one another. They hold each other in balance and securely in place.
So this is what leading from the feminine looks and feels like
As I joined hundreds of thousands of other marchers in Los Angeles on January 21st, it struck me how much this experience represented for me what leading from the feminine looks and feels like. I found myself coining my own phrase for it – what came to me was: power humanified.
Power humanified
Although I anticipated that discord and perhaps even violence may erupt on the day of the March, especially in a large urban center, and during such a highly charged political climate right now – I was filled with a reassuring contrast, from start to finish throughout the day.
I found myself immersed in a completely peaceful, collaborative, supportive, and nonviolent expanse of humanity. From the trains to the roadways to the downtown street crossings, to security officers to the marchers, to the weather even (!), all seemed to be cooperating. Now, I wouldn’t say that this type of energy is at all limited to one particular gender. And, I realize that this day may have been an isolated occurrence whose energy and peaceful activism may not last in the coming weeks and months. Regardless, I can say that at least it is possible; I was there; I witnessed it; I experienced it. It happened.
It was striking to notice, too, that the men who attended seemed to feel ‘free to let down their shield’ so to speak – the stereotype of men having to be forceful, stoic, and nonexpressive, truly seemed to fall to the wayside. I watched as the men among us enjoyed being supportive and feeling supportive and supported themselves. They were welcomed into the fold, and walked side by side, not charging ahead or showing dominance in any way. This was equal footing.
And let me say a few words about American privilege, whether you are a man or a woman. Yes, I am an American, born and raised. I’ve traveled to other countries and other continents, and yet I do not presume to understand fully the experience of women (or men) who have been raised outside the United States. I do recognize that I’ve been able to travel by way of means and access not readily available to women in many countries. What I find a bit difficult to accept, though, is the suggestion posited by some that because women in some non-American countries suffer unimaginable violence and abuse, that this somehow diminishes the need to increase awareness of the injustices and inequities in our own land.
While twenty-two countries from Argentina, to Chile, to Croatia, to Denmark, to Germany, to Jamaica, to Norway, for example, have had women leaders in recent years as their head of state (Presidents or Prime Ministers), America still has had none. For a century and a half after the nation’s founding, the women in the United States had no legally recognized right to vote.
Is it about ensuring that any woman attain the highest office in the land? No. Unequivocally, I say no. I would suggest, though, that a woman who brings abundantly more experience and depth of knowledge than the other frontrunner (man or woman) running, then yes. I say yes.
Words, and symbols hold power in them
In response to the proliferation of pink hats worn during the marches, a friend of mine posed the following question: “Isn’t that merely perpetuating gender stereotyping?” My response to his question is this: When you’re a member of the stereotyped group, there’s power in taking back the words or symbols that have been misappropriated by those who are not members of that group. There’s strength in reclaiming those words or symbols that have for generations been used to demean, belittle, or make dismissible the members of that group. So, to that end, I say yes, pink is ours…you can have it, too, thank you kindly, if you would please do so with honor and reverence, and not with arrogance, disgust, or power-over.
Many women, and some men, each have their examples of being “put down” for their gender. I’ll share one here. As a civil litigator working for a defense firm in Los Angeles, I was a young associate and member of a three-attorney trial team (myself, and two male partners). We had just returned from a successful day in court. I was pleased that we advocated well for our clients, and had emerged victorious.
As the three of us rode back up the elevator together from the underground parking lot to our firm’s office suite, after returning from our day in court, this transpired: The managing partner, in front of the other male partner, turns to me and says: “You did a nice job in there today…for…a girl.” A few minutes later, the two partners then took off to have a celebratory dinner on their own, leaving me to stay at the office to continue working that evening.
Women are “girls.” And, men are well, men (or ‘dudes’ when leaning toward the more casual). And, they’re held to different standards of what’s acceptable. [There’s a case in Northern California, for example, where the judge has issued sanctions against the male attorney who made accusations that the female opposing counsel had purportedly displayed “unlady-like” behaviors during a deposition.]
Even the word “guys” has been blurred to include men and women in ‘mixed company,’ because, well, its true counterpart “gals” doesn’t seem to stand on equal footing, either.
Often men are referred by their last names, while women are referred by their first names. Women themselves often perpetuate this disparity in usage. Many have come to accept it simply as commonplace. A way too subtle, picky difference over which to make a fuss, you may say? Maybe. It’s the very subtlety of it, though, that makes it that much more able to escape scrutiny. It’s not as blatant as “bitch” or “chick” (both of which are animal references, and as such are used as a way to dehumanize). So, it’s sometimes easier to let slide.
Nonetheless, this pervasive belittling, whether overt or covert, brings with it a price. That price is the ability of all people to embrace and exhibit all of who they are, with authenticity and dare I say even wild abandon. Society as a whole suffers. Repression costs us all.
Vibrating resonance
Despite what some may contend, I vote for the continuation of the conversations that have come to the forefront during this recent election cycle, and its aftermath. I’m suggesting that the marches worldwide on January 21st were not an isolated moment in time. Although a powerful day on its own, I’d say it started a “reverb” like no other, at least since perhaps the Civil Rights movement. As with strumming a guitar, the sound continues its vibration well after the first chord or note is struck. January 21st was a strong strum heard ‘round the world.
May we continue strumming. And may we lead from the feminine.
Oh, and remind me to share the story sometime – the one about when I showed up on the lot at Paramount Studios to be an extra in a movie, and ended up playing a suffragette who marched in the streets during a President Wilson campaign rally.
Yep, that happened. And, so did the marches this past weekend, millions of people strong, worldwide.
Power humanified.
Okay, your turn:
What, if anything, did you take away from the recent marches around the globe? To what extent do you feel there’s a resurrection of the feminine? Is this merely spiritual mumbo jumbo, or evidence of a real shift, rooted in practical reality? What would you like to see more fully emerging in our world going forward?
I invite you to share your thoughts, feelings, and experiences in the Comments section, below. Soul-to-soul!
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!